BondGovernance — Infrastructure for Secured Bonds

§ 07.4 — ESMA Prospectus

ESMA Prospectus Annex 15: the information bond covenants must disclose.

Annex 15 to Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 sets the minimum disclosure for wholesale non-equity securities. It does not prescribe a covenant format, but it requires that the terms and conditions of the securities, including covenants, events of default and security arrangements, are described accurately enough for an investor to assess the investment. The disclosure is a snapshot at issuance. Continuous governance turns it into a living record.

BondGovernance, Regulatory desk · Editorial standard

Reviewed 2026-07-01 · Primary-source cited below

01

The Annex 15 obligation, in plain terms

Annex 15 to the Prospectus Regulation applies to wholesale non-equity securities, including most secured bonds. It requires disclosure of the terms and conditions of the securities, the rights of holders, the security and collateral structure, and any covenants, undertakings or events of default. The standard is not a tick-box list: the information must be sufficient for an investor to make an informed assessment of the assets, liabilities, financial position, profit and loss, prospects and rights attached to the securities.

02

Where covenants live in the prospectus

Covenants typically appear in the risk factors, the terms and conditions, and the description of the security documents. A negative pledge, a limitation on indebtedness, a collateral coverage test, or an issuer covenant to maintain insurance each has a direct effect on the security package. The prospectus must describe these accurately, but it does not, by itself, monitor whether the issuer continues to comply with them.

03

From disclosure to continuous governance

The supervisory expectation, reinforced by the refinancing wall and the widening fiduciary duties of bond agents, is that covenant compliance is monitored continuously and documented on request. The prospectus is the legal baseline. A governance platform is the operational layer that maps each disclosed covenant to a data feed, evaluates it against the indenture text, and preserves a timestamped record of every check.

04

Why extraction accuracy matters

If a covenant is extracted incorrectly during onboarding, every subsequent alert, waiver and board pack is wrong. A deterministic extraction pipeline, validated against the prospectus and the final terms, ensures that the covenant text, the trigger thresholds and the applicable exceptions are captured exactly as disclosed. The same source document is then used for audit, supervisory review and investor reporting.

§ Key takeaways

  • K.01

    Annex 15 applies to wholesale non-equity securities and requires accurate disclosure of covenants, security and events of default.

  • K.02

    The prospectus is a snapshot. Continuous governance turns the disclosed terms into a monitored, auditable record.

  • K.03

    Covenants appear across risk factors, terms and conditions, and security documents; extraction must reconcile all three.

  • K.04

    Deterministic extraction from the source document prevents drift between the prospectus and the monitoring layer.

§ Primary sources

  1. [01]

    Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading

    European Union · OJ L 168, 30.6.2017, p. 12

    Read at source ↗
  2. [02]

    Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/980, Prospectus RTS, Annexes I to XXIV

    European Commission · OJ L 146, 31.5.2019, p. 1

    Read at source ↗
  3. [03]

    Questions and Answers on the Prospectus Regulation

    ESMA · ESMA32-63-349

    Read at source ↗